2 min read431 words

If a Wife Was a Divorcee and Lied to a Brother About It and They Wedded, Is That Marriage Binding on the Brother?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 6/28/2026

Direct Answer
No—if her first husband was still living when they wed, that union is not a marriage before God and is not binding on the brother. If her former husband had already died, then she was free to marry and the marriage is binding despite her lie.

Scriptural Explanation
- The Bible says a wife is “bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth,” and is loosed only by death (Romans 7:2–3; 1 Corinthians 7:39).
- Jesus said, “Whosoever shall marry her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery” (Luke 16:18; see also Mark 10:11–12). So a civil divorce does not dissolve the first covenant while the spouse lives.
- The “exception” of Matthew 19:9 concerns fornication discovered before the marriage covenant (as with Joseph and Mary, Matthew 1:18–20), not a license to dissolve a true marriage and remarry.
- Fraud or lying does not create or dissolve a marriage. The only decisive question is whether a prior, living covenant still bound her (Romans 7:2–3).

Simple Clarifying Logic
- If her former husband was alive, she was still bound to him; therefore the later wedding did not form a lawful marriage. That means:
- The union should be treated as invalid from the start (annulment).
- The brother is not bound and must cease the conjugal relationship.
- After separation and repentance, he is free to marry “only in the Lord,” because no true marriage ever existed.
- If her former husband had died before this wedding, she was free to marry; the present marriage is valid and lifelong. The lie was sin and must be confessed, but it does not dissolve a valid covenant.

Apply the steps
- Was it valid from inception? Only if the former husband was already dead.
- Does it remain binding? Yes, if valid; no, if invalid.
- Separation permitted? Required if invalid; not permitted if valid (though temporary separation without remarriage can occur for grave necessity, 1 Corinthians 7:10–11).
- Annulment? Yes, if a prior living spouse still bound her; no, if she was a widow.
- Remarriage? The brother may marry in the Lord if annulment applies; if the marriage is valid, neither party may remarry while both live (Romans 7:2–3).

One clear conclusion
- If her first husband is alive, the “marriage” is not binding and should be treated as no marriage at all.
- If her first husband is dead, the marriage is binding for life.

If you can confirm whether her former husband is living, I can state the final binding status immediately.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 39

Questions and Answers, Part 2

Sunday evening, the 23rd of August of 1964 at the Branham Tabernacle in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

64-0823E §69

QUESTION: Brother Branham, in Genesis 6 and verse 12, God said that all flesh had corrupted his way. Does this have reference to divorce and marriage? If so, didn't Jesus have reference to the same thing when He said that, "As it was in the days of Noah, so shall it be when the Son of man will be revealed" in Matthew 24, verse 38 and 39?

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38

A Greater Witness than John

Thursday, the 9th of June 1955

55-0609 §5

You know what? That's a good thing. You just be salty; God will produce the thirst. If you ... you just be salty. Brother Beeler, would you stand up, just a moment? Brother Beeler is a personal friend of mine, an evangelist, a very dear brother, Brother Estel Beeler. And I think his wife and babies are on the ground here, somewhere, very good friends. And usually, I have to preach when I come in, I don't get a chance. God bless you, Brother Beeler. Now, to someone else: Here is a friend of mine, Brother Leo Mercer....

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38

Things that are to be

Sunday, the 5th of December 1965

65-1205 §88

I had some scars when I was a kid. I know things that happened that's kind of turned me that way. But it was all God's making, molding me for this hour. See? Now, I think a real genuine sister, there's nothing any nicer. If God could give a man anything better than salvation, He give him a wife. See? And so then, if He could give anything better, he would've done it. And then, to see some of them turn and don't even act like a wife, unloyal to their marriage vows and their husband's the same. You remember, you're b...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38

A Greater Witness than John

Thursday, the 9th of June 1955

55-0609 §4

And I got a piece out of a Durban paper, that one man, who didn't even know which was right and left hand, was baptizing as many as a thousand a week: natives, out in the jungle, out in the field. That's it. He didn't even know which was right and left hand, but he knew that he'd got healed, and Jesus loved him, and he was telling his native friends. Taking them right down to the water and baptized them, just as they come. So, that is wonderful. So, while you're supporting ... or, helping in this offering for Broth...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 38

The Queen of Sheba

Friday evening, the 1st of April 1960 at the Municipal Auditorium in Tulsa, Oklahoma, U.S.A.

60-0401E §1

[Pastor introduces Brother Lamsa.] ... he speaks the language and can read the language and read the original documents in which the New Testament was written. So with him, it is so wonderful that he can read directly from the original script the very words that Jesus and the disciples spoke and wrote. He felt that these translations that we have are not always correct and true. And that's where the criticism comes in, because he criticizes the King James version, and some people think that St. Paul preached from t...

Read source context