2 min read431 words

If a Wife Was a Divorcee and Lied to a Brother About It and They Wedded, Is That Marriage Binding on the Brother?

Login to save this to your study library.

Answered by True Bible Teachings AI on 6/28/2026

Direct Answer
No—if her first husband was still living when they wed, that union is not a marriage before God and is not binding on the brother. If her former husband had already died, then she was free to marry and the marriage is binding despite her lie.

Scriptural Explanation
- The Bible says a wife is “bound by the law to her husband so long as he liveth,” and is loosed only by death (Romans 7:2–3; 1 Corinthians 7:39).
- Jesus said, “Whosoever shall marry her that is put away from her husband committeth adultery” (Luke 16:18; see also Mark 10:11–12). So a civil divorce does not dissolve the first covenant while the spouse lives.
- The “exception” of Matthew 19:9 concerns fornication discovered before the marriage covenant (as with Joseph and Mary, Matthew 1:18–20), not a license to dissolve a true marriage and remarry.
- Fraud or lying does not create or dissolve a marriage. The only decisive question is whether a prior, living covenant still bound her (Romans 7:2–3).

Simple Clarifying Logic
- If her former husband was alive, she was still bound to him; therefore the later wedding did not form a lawful marriage. That means:
- The union should be treated as invalid from the start (annulment).
- The brother is not bound and must cease the conjugal relationship.
- After separation and repentance, he is free to marry “only in the Lord,” because no true marriage ever existed.
- If her former husband had died before this wedding, she was free to marry; the present marriage is valid and lifelong. The lie was sin and must be confessed, but it does not dissolve a valid covenant.

Apply the steps
- Was it valid from inception? Only if the former husband was already dead.
- Does it remain binding? Yes, if valid; no, if invalid.
- Separation permitted? Required if invalid; not permitted if valid (though temporary separation without remarriage can occur for grave necessity, 1 Corinthians 7:10–11).
- Annulment? Yes, if a prior living spouse still bound her; no, if she was a widow.
- Remarriage? The brother may marry in the Lord if annulment applies; if the marriage is valid, neither party may remarry while both live (Romans 7:2–3).

One clear conclusion
- If her first husband is alive, the “marriage” is not binding and should be treated as no marriage at all.
- If her first husband is dead, the marriage is binding for life.

If you can confirm whether her former husband is living, I can state the final binding status immediately.

What did the Laodicean Church Age (our age) Angel (- messenger) Say about this?

Ranked passages from the local William Branham sermon and Church Age Book database. Relevance is relative, not a statement of doctrinal certainty.

SermonRelevance 36

The Marriage of the Lamb

Sunday evening, the 21st of January 1962 at the Fellowship Tabernacle in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A.

62-0121E §36

And the other day, I met him. And he said... (Oswald J. Smith, many of you know Brother Smith. He's a great missionary, and he comes to Brother Cobble because he likes him so well.) He said, "Brother Cobble, you know," he said, "I [something about his wife]..." He said, "When I first got married," said, "I felt like, well, if I make a mistake, I'll... Oh, I can get another one," 'cause he was young. But said, "After the children comes along," said, "then it's kind of hard to do without her. Then when you get about...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 36Broader match

Marriage and Divorce

Sunday morning, the 21st of February 1965 at the Parkview Junior High School in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

65-0221M §19

Now, it may be a little lengthy. I don't want you to be in any hurry and I... Just take your time (all of us) and study the Word of God truly and thoroughly as we know how to study it. Let's begin with St. Matthew, the nineteenth chapter, and beginning, I think, with the eighth verse of the nineteenth chapter, I wish to start. I might start also with the first and read down through the eighth verse of the nineteenth chapter. Now, remember, these things that I say must come from the Word of God. It can't be my own o...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 36

Redemption by judgment

Sunday, the 14th of November 1954

54-1114 §12

Now, I believe that the next announcement is, to think of this week ... I wasn't going to start. I was going to trying to feel out about coming here to the Tabernacle for a few nights here, as I promised you, to do. And, we'll perhaps do it just a little later. But a poor, dear brother come down to Brother Wright's the other day, and waded through them bushes back there to Brother Roy Roberson and I, from down here. And he's in an awful condition, and he wanted me to come down, hold a few nights for him. He announc...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 36

Having conferences

Wednesday, the 8th of June 1960

60-0608 §67

Now, look. I've ... when I was a sinner I never run around. I wasn't ornery to run around with women. Now, I don't care how saintly a man tries to live and how godly he lives, if a woman puts her arms around a man, it's a human sensation. Now, you just might as well... I don't care, you can call yourself sanctified---and I believe in sanctification, too---but you're still a human. That's exactly right, and there's a sensation. I don't say you'd do wrong. Certainly not. The power of God keeps you, and you go on. But...

Read source context

SermonRelevance 36

Marriage and Divorce

Sunday morning, the 21st of February 1965 at the Parkview Junior High School in Jeffersonville, Indiana, U.S.A.

65-0221M §80

Now, look. In the final analysis, look, there is one Jesus Christ. Is that right? One man, God Immanuel. Do you believe that? But the members of His wife are many, thousands times thousands of thousands. Is that right? His wife, the bride, the church. You understand now? That's why He said to Adam before sex was ever induced ... or, introduced, "Multiply to replenish the earth"---when he was yet in the beginning, when he was yet both male and female in himself! There it shows then that the bride's got to come from...

Read source context